This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Weintraub, W. S. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Weintraub, W. S. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Pharmacoeconomic Concepts in Antiplatelet Therapy: Understanding Cost-Effectiveness Analyses Using Clopidogrel as an Example

Christiana Care Health System, Center for Heart & Vascular Health, Newark, Delaware, wweintraub{at}christianacare.org

The rising cost of drug therapy has been accompanied by demands from payers for pharmacoeconomic studies to assess the value for money of new treatments.There are 5 types of such analyses: cost analysis (evaluates only costs); cost minimization (compares costs of treatments with identical outcomes); cost-effectiveness (evaluates the cost of treatment in relation to clinical benefit to derive a cost per outcome); cost utility (evaluates cost of treatment in relation to survival adjusted for quality of life,) and cost benefit (evaluates all clinical outcomes, such as prolonged life, in monetary terms). The most commonly used are cost-effectiveness and cost utility. The aim of this article is to provide the nonexpert reader with a basic understanding of these analyses, using pharmacoeconomic evaluations of clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes as examples. Greater clinician understanding of pharmacoeconomic principles (and pitfalls) will enhance input of the physicians into the decision-making process to maximize the benefit of limited health care resources.

Key Words: pharmacoeconomics • cost benefit • clopidogrel • cost utility • economic burden

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?